<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Chair election dates
- To: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>, "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Chair election dates
- From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:04:00 -0400
- Cc: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <CA68B5E734151B4299391DDA5D0AF9BF10806D@mx1.dsoft.sk>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As stated, I agree.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M."
<roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Hugh Dierker"
<hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>; "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:41 PM
Subject: RE: [ga] Chair election dates
Chris, I would say one year is too long for the first run as long as the
roles are not clarified enough yet, which might be discouraging for
someone to accept the nomination.
I would keep the period of half a year to get started with, as Eric has
proposed. After then we'll see.
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of kidsearch
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 5:10 PM
To: Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
Cc: Joop Teernstra; Hugh Dierker; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] Chair election dates
Good point Rod. I want to make a motion that the term of office for
chair and vice chair 1 year. Any seconds? Do we need to vote on this or
is a motion good enough?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Hugh Dierker"
<hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>; "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Chair election dates
As a precursor to voting for chair/vice chair, it seems appropriate
to
determine/vote on the term of the office(s). Even before that,
however,
the question I have is whether the GA members may do anything other
than
debate/discuss ICANN issues. Without an authoritative green light
from
the GNSO, on what basis do we proceed? Is there an ICANN board member
supportive of the GA's self-re- organizing effort? I do not have any
answers to my questions, but I am hopeful someone reading this might.
To
say the obvious: if some assurances are forthcoming, it would be
better
to proceed with some assurances than none. Let's not waste effort.
Rod
On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:50 PM, kidsearch wrote:
I think that many of us hope to add that to the goals. I personally
would like to rebuild the GA. But I imagine part of the discussion
in
the beginning for this list is to decide on short and long term
goals.
The structure being put into place will faciliate that IMO.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M."
<roddixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>; "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:47 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] Chair election dates
I agree that future voting participation will aid the credibility
of
the current effort. I have a couple of questions for the list
members.
My understanding of the results of the February voting: a neutral
chair (having a term of ?) will facilitate debate, and the vice
chair
will do the same when filling in for the chair. Is this correct?
Is there a goal to accomplish anything other than debate/discuss
ICANN
issues? Are we trying to re-constitute the GA into something
resembling its status under the DNSO? It may be helpful in gaining
voting participation to clarify the goals of this effort.
-Rod
On Mar 14, 2007, at 8:40 PM, Joop Teernstra wrote:
At 02:23 a.m. 15/03/2007, Eric wrote:
I have asked Joop to neutrally set dates for the close of
nominations and then voting.
I'll oblige. Nominations for Chair and vice-chair can be made on
this
list until the 25th of March, 00:00 GMT
All nominations must be seconded in order to be valid.
Acceptances must be received by this list at the latest on the
28th
of March, 00:00 GMT
Voting (or endorsement as the case may be) will start immediately
on
the 28th of March, 2007 at 00:00 GMT and will close on April 2,
00:00
GMT
May I ask Chris to tabulate the nominations that have been
received
so far?
To increase participation in this vote and in future polls, I
would
encourage all members of this list to register as GA- voters on
the
www.pollingbooth.info site
A low participation is not going to help the credibility of this
effort.
-joop-
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|