<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: [Politech] Data retention bill officially surfaces in the U.S. Congress [priv]
- To: Declan McCullagh <declan@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: [Politech] Data retention bill officially surfaces in the U.S. Congress [priv]
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 03:52:39 -0800
- Cc: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, james tierney <james.tierney@xxxxxxxxx>, Kathy Smith <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, aba isc list <ST-ISC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <45C983B5.40205@well.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Declan and all,
Well this bill goes part way but not far enough. Search engines and
web hosting companies as well as registries, and registrars also
should be included.
Declan McCullagh wrote:
> Well, it took a few years, but it finally happened. A data retention
> bill was introduced today, courtesy of the those freedom-loving House
> Republicans and their "law and order agenda." But it's actually a
> Democrat (Rep. Diana DeGette) who's the most enthusiastic proponent of
> this scheme, so you can bet that whatever happens will be bipartisan in
> the end.
>
> Oh, and the bill also includes mandatory Web labeling.
>
> I've placed the documents here:
> http://politechbot.com/docs/smith.data.retention.labeling.draft.020607.pdf
> http://politechbot.com/docs/smith.gop.law.and.order.agenda.020607.doc
> http://politechbot.com/docs/smith.republican.agenda.package.020607.doc
>
> And my article is here:
> http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6156948.html
>
> Excerpt:
> Details about data retention requirements would be left to Gonzales. At
> a minimum, the bill says, the regulations must require storing records
> "such as the name and address of the subscriber or registered user to
> whom an Internet Protocol address, user identification or telephone
> number was assigned, in order to permit compliance with court orders."
> Because there is no limit on how broad the rules can be, Gonzales would
> be permitted to force Internet providers to keep logs of Web browsing,
> instant message exchanges, or e-mail conversations indefinitely. (The
> bill does not, however, explicitly cover search engines or Web hosting
> companies, which officials have talked about before as targets of
> regulation.)
>
> Previous Politech message:
> http://www.politechbot.com/2007/01/24/not-just-isps/
>
> -Declan
> _______________________________________________
> Politech mailing list
> Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
> Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|