<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] dotLA
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] dotLA
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:34:02 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=sn8d3VRhAN/+rN/rBTBjZ7YCCn8L2yWzKO48+GrUwelWFHFWNe5/ntj8uV7FW79gozh8TSSMDQLqKRW3mUY3tecP2QOpkwPqpFiR0hMDoB2KJ8ZzvR1FWK0Td0PUp/QcJh/7FhDNkl2hitkyDCl+AYByR3OtjUGCi0Un9x9cRKI=;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Several years ago I watched the "land rush" on the dotLA, I believe Laos.
Now I see this; http://ryan444123.com/?p=219
"The city of Los Angeles has been the first city to have approved the use of a domain extension by ICANN. This new extension however cost $1.50 a week, or $5 a month ending up to be $60 a year. .la names, however, are a ground breaking event. Maybe we will see more city names popping up in the coming years? Who knows!"
So then I go look and;
http://www.iana.org/root-whois/la.htm
Is someone just laughing at me?
Eric
---------------------------------
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|