<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] dotLA
- To: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] dotLA
- From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:29:46 -0500
- References: <517401.6571.qm@web52901.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
far as I know it's still laos. this just looks like clever marketing like dot tv being tuvalu not television.
----- Original Message -----
From: Hugh Dierker
To: ga
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 7:34 PM
Subject: [ga] dotLA
Several years ago I watched the "land rush" on the dotLA, I believe Laos.
Now I see this; http://ryan444123.com/?p=219
"The city of Los Angeles has been the first city to have approved the use of a domain extension by ICANN. This new extension however cost $1.50 a week, or $5 a month ending up to be $60 a year. .la names, however, are a ground breaking event. Maybe we will see more city names popping up in the coming years? Who knows!"
So then I go look and;
http://www.iana.org/root-whois/la.htm
Is someone just laughing at me?
Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with theYahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|