Re: [ga] Ticketless

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If you believe 4 beats 4 you are right. However the whole co-chair deal got only 2. That means it didn't win the vote.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Hugh Dierker 
  To: Joop Teernstra 
  Cc: ga 
  Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 6:11 PM
  Subject: Re: [ga] Ticketless


  Wrong. Not Vice Chair. Co-chair.
  "Other" I thought won the vote. Am I wrong?
  Eric

  Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    At 06:21 a.m. 5/02/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
    >Should the election for co-chairs be on a ticket? I think not. 1st and 2ND 
    >place vote getter's or by consensus would be optimum.

    Agreed. Keep it simple. Most votes:chair. Second: vice chair.
    The Vice chair is there to guarantee continuity and to assist the chair 
    with the work.

    6 months, 12 months term, maybe the nominees can have a say in that before 
    they accept the nomination.

    Or it would be another vote on the job description prior to the election.



    --Joop--
    http://www.pollingbooth.info/generalassemblysignup/

    www.icannatlarge.com






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  It's here! Your new message!
  Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.