<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Ticketless
- To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Ticketless
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:11:30 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=JkYmLiyGsSTOcSDbyMwFGuzChBoC/eMwHCAdi7bW1OM/vs2v6Vhx2MSrVNH+IXFhAS2n3zeO785jBHw7yPySvQ4mtvNr0wfBEoIksA3CvmnwzAng/+ExcUi4FglmvcDNhidINuReCq29AAMbt476PNgdIYbw89rNh8k1BqhLvN0=;
- In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.2.20070205111651.01b18ec0@mail.terabytz.co.nz>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wrong. Not Vice Chair. Co-chair.
"Other" I thought won the vote. Am I wrong?
Eric
Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 06:21 a.m. 5/02/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
>Should the election for co-chairs be on a ticket? I think not. 1st and 2ND
>place vote getter's or by consensus would be optimum.
Agreed. Keep it simple. Most votes:chair. Second: vice chair.
The Vice chair is there to guarantee continuity and to assist the chair
with the work.
6 months, 12 months term, maybe the nominees can have a say in that before
they accept the nomination.
Or it would be another vote on the job description prior to the election.
--Joop--
http://www.pollingbooth.info/generalassemblysignup/
www.icannatlarge.com
---------------------------------
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|