<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Mission Creep?
- To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Mission Creep?
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:13:25 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=3S5kkbVu3h6gEJ57kR+QEHHJbiwHwevKmO+9cPuXJkFsINm+wTH9PTpcIbrcQQgwCMk0AvYUaq4troqpSGNCkeP6EWOGJihj7qZS152MFRxkDNjnv0WFEHfRtpPo3haERJpAcr9XkjgyUubGWabMxvwuXufz0lULiNmWScD1RYo=;
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I really appreciate my ICANN alerts. I think this bit on the NomCom is good and I like the idea of statements of interest.
But in reading it the position descriptions sometimes left me wondering about Mission Creep.
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-01feb07.htm
No, in this case it is not so much as what is written, but rather what is not written.
Eric
---------------------------------
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|