<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0
- To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0
- From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 19:11:22 +0100
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acca6I4VLaOZtTgcRyiSd4U2V2SjzQAA4rJg
- Thread-topic: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org registry agreements by 13-0
That's what I've supposed to have happened...
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 5:41 PM
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ga] ICANN Board unanimously approves .biz/.info/.org
registry agreements by 13-0
> What does "the failure of the GNSO Council to complete its PDP process
> on registry agreements" mean?
>
It means that for ICANN's ivory tower 'civil society' insider's crowd,
ANY PRETEXT even if it makes no REAL sense and especially if it does NOT
serve the wider public interest is a good enough reason to do as they
please.
NO SURPRISES HERE!
Sotiris
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|