<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Eliminating the Add Grace Period
- To: tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Eliminating the Add Grace Period
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:41:38 -0800
- Cc: "'ga'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <00aa01c70d7a$7ae3f740$6700a8c0@blackdell>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas and all,
Here, here Thomas! I would have used the term "Stakeholder"
or "Registrant" instead of "Consumer". In any event, your quite
right. Well done! ICANN is not pro-consumer/Stakeholder/
Registrant, and never has been.
Thomas Barrett - EnCirca wrote:
> Is there anyone out there really concerned about protecting the interests of
> the consumer?
>
> Giving the consumer the option of immediately deleting a name is
> pro-consumer.
>
> Eliminating the Add Grace Period is anti-consumer.
>
> Giving the consumer the option of immediately deleting a name argues for
> both the continuance of the ADD Grace period AND adding a RENEW Grace
> Period.
>
> Allowing for a RENEW Grace Period would be a pro-consumer move. It is very
> common for a customer to renew a name by mistake. Today, the only options
> for a renewal mistake are to issue a credit card charge-back or ask the
> registrar to eat the fee. Eliminating the Add Grace Period would reduce the
> consumer to the same two sorry options.
>
> So, let's stop pretending that eliminating the Add Grace Period is
> pro-consumer. It is not.
>
> Rather than simply abolishing the ADD Grace Period, there should be more
> creative thinking to find a way to address domain tasting without harming
> the consumer.
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom Barrett
> EnCirca, Inc
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|