ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are Unacceptable


to be clear this is not the BoD but the current gnso-sanctioned process.

On 19-Oct-06, at 1:57 PM, kidsearch wrote:

lol. Now that's funny I don't care who you are. ICANN BoD thinking it has
the knowledge to decide which tlds are worthwhile and which or not is
laughable at best. The people at Xerox passed on the mouse and HP passed up
the pc. I'm not thinking the BoD members are smarter than these CEOs. You
cannot predict what will work or not work down the road. If you think you
have that knowledge you are a fool. So why is ICANN reviewing business plans
to see whether or not a tld is viable or not?



----- Original Message ----- From: "elliot noss" <enoss@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:36 PM Subject: Re: [ga] Responses by .biz/info/org Registry Operators are Unacceptable


don't forget whether they thought that your driving was a "good
thing" for the world (whatever that means).

On 19-Oct-06, at 12:29 PM, Karl Auerbach wrote:

Gomes, Chuck wrote:

Where do you think funding of the application process costs should
come
from if not from the applicant?

I suspect that most of us would say that the applicant ought to cover the expenses of processing the application.

However many (perhaps most outside of the IP community) would say
that the current expenses are orders of magnitude too high because
the inquiry that is being made by ICANN is not appropriately focused.


Imagine if you went to your state's department of motor vehicles to
get a driver's license.  And instead of determining whether you are
of legal age and able to drive, they insist on doing, and you
paying for, an investigation of your lifestyle, your finances,
whether you attended all sessions of all your classes in college
(only college graduates need apply), and require you to present a
lifetime set of dental x-rays and a letter of recommendation from
the minister of your church (agnostics need not apply.)

ICANN's only proper inquiry is whether the applicant will abide by
written, broadly accepted technical standards.  That's something
that is as simple as a short checklist - see for example the rather
short and concise IANA list of items for proper technical operation
of a TLD.

The cost of that simple evaluation ought to be only a few dollars -
roughly 1/1000th of what ICANN is charging now.

--karl--





--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.5/483 - Release Date: 10/18/06








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>