Re: [ga] court supervision, follow on article

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Unless it's for IP interests?


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 6:02 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] court supervision, follow on article 


> 
> >some hot water or be held in contempt.  If I were this
> >Judge, I would hold every executive of spamhaus's registry,
> >ICANN, and all of ICANN's BoD members in Jail pending
> >compliance of my order.
> 
> 
> You're funny. But at least this time you're attacking only the BoD, 
> not the staff - that's called progress.
> 
> http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-10oct06.htm
> 
> Even if ICANN were properly brought before the court in this matter, 
> which ICANN has not been, ICANN cannot comply with any order 
> requiring it to suspend or place a client hold on Spamhaus.org or any 
> specific domain name because ICANN does not have either the ability 
> or the authority to do so. Only the Internet registrar with whom the 
> registrant has a contractual relationship - and in certain instances 
> the Internet registry - can suspend an individual domain name.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely,
> Veni Markovski
> http://www.veni.com
> 
> check also my blog:
> http://blog.veni.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.2/471 - Release Date: 10/10/06
> 
>