ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Tiered (Variable) Pricing

  • To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Tiered (Variable) Pricing
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:39:35 -0700
  • Cc: "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, Kathy Smith <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <20060831125648.26351.qmail@web52205.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny, Michael and all,

  Michael: I have to agree with Danny here to a great degree.  However,
Registries/registrars also should not be restricted on Pricing of "new
domain name
registrations" long as there is no arbitrary restriction on the
introduction of new
TLD's and new registrars.  Business Plan "Sniping" by the GAC or the
ICANN
BoD, also not withstanding.  Free market enterprise must be allowed to
work
with minimal restriction via regulation.  Existing/already registered
domain names in any TLD namespace should not at time of renual,
have the registrant's domain name price hiked for any reason.  Such
would be a financial burden that is anti free market.

Danny Younger wrote:

> Michael,
>
> The Community has drawn a line in the sand.  Catering
> to the naked greed of registry operators is not an
> option.
>
> Your proposed compromise is not acceptable -- owing to
> economies of scale, prices should be going down, not
> up -- instead of increases, we should be discussing a
> fixed percentage annual decrease.
>
> All price hike proposals should be withdrawn.
> Registries should focus on profit enhancement only by
> way of new registry service offerings.
>
> Best regards,
> Danny
>
> --- "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hello All:
> >
> > In the interesting of continuing a very constructive
> > dialog with regard
> > to tiered pricing, I have published the following
> > article on CircleID,
> > see
> >
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/tiered_variable_pricing_compromise/.
> > Some of the initial comments such as George's
> > continues to take an "all
> > or nothing approach" to the current registry
> > contracts.  The purpose of
> > this article was to address what I saw as one
> > loophole which could be
> > closed to protect reasonable expectation interests
> > of registrants while
> > allowing registries the flexibility to use
> > tiered(variable) pricing in
> > their business operations.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Michael D. Palage
> >
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>