Re: [ga] Tiered (Variable) Pricing

[Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>]

Michael,

The Community has drawn a line in the sand.  Catering
to the naked greed of registry operators is not an
option.  

Your proposed compromise is not acceptable -- owing to
economies of scale, prices should be going down, not
up -- instead of increases, we should be discussing a
fixed percentage annual decrease.

All price hike proposals should be withdrawn.
Registries should focus on profit enhancement only by
way of new registry service offerings.

Best regards,
Danny


--- "Michael D. Palage" <Michael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello All:
> 
> In the interesting of continuing a very constructive
> dialog with regard
> to tiered pricing, I have published the following
> article on CircleID,
> see
>
http://www.circleid.com/posts/tiered_variable_pricing_compromise/.
> Some of the initial comments such as George's
> continues to take an "all
> or nothing approach" to the current registry
> contracts.  The purpose of
> this article was to address what I saw as one
> loophole which could be
> closed to protect reasonable expectation interests
> of registrants while
> allowing registries the flexibility to use
> tiered(variable) pricing in
> their business operations.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Michael D. Palage
> 
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com