Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

And they have reached them. Thats why you feel you are being unfairly
attacked on these issues. The gap between the way ICANN feels they hjave
respoonded to the community and the way the community feels you have
responded is wider than the grand canyon.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Elmar Knipp"
<Elmar.Knipp@xxxxxxxx>; "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz
contract


> At 12:00 PM 03.8.2006 '?.'  -0400, kidsearch wrote:
> >We have offered solutions for a long time Veni. Personally since about
1998.
> >Whenever they are always ignored it doesn't make for an encouraging
debate.
>
> No comments. People can read it and reach their conclusions.
>
> veni
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 8/2/06
>
>