<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract
Elmar,
the funny thing is, that I responded to the question, but it seems
people are more interested in the "juicy" discussion, not in the
response to Danny's question. And as you may note, my response is
based not on my thoughts, but on documents.
And if someone has asked me for my "opinion", I would have given it
earlier. But I was asked for "guidance", and that is what kind of
made me go into all details. Are we talking about bottom-up or
top-bottom process here? Where are the solutions, provided by the
community? I can tell you about problems around ICANN, which probably
you don't even notice. But I want to hear the community provide
solutions, not problems. If the community can not provide solutions,
that's not good.
veni
At 12:09 PM 03.8.2006 '?.' +0200, Elmar Knipp wrote:
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Veni Markovski wrote:
Yes, you can ask one Board member, but as I can't and shouldn't
speak on behalf of ICANN, my opinion, and not guiadance (why do you
need a guidance from a single board director???), would be given in
a response to your previous message.
Veni,
your self-conception about an ICANN director seems to me, let it say
it politely, a little bit odd ;-)
If someone asks you about *your* opinion as an ICANN director
regarding ICANN matters, then it is in my view not the appropriate
answer to say "please ask the president". You are responsible for
your decisions and you have to give statements to your community;
which BTW has voted for you.
To hide between the netiquette and other excuses is not what the
community needs here.
Best regards,
Elmar
--
_____________________________________________________________________
| |
| knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
------- Technologiepark
Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9
44227 Dortmund
Germany
Fon: +49 231 9703-0
Elmar.Knipp@xxxxxxxx Fax: +49 231 9703-200
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|