Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I quoted it from that post, so it is what Karl said and what you agreed to.
The previous post said you didn't think it appropriate. Just wanted
clarification on that.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Karl Auerbach"
<karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz
contract


> At 11:53 AM 03.8.2006 '?.'  -0400, kidsearch wrote:
> >Veni, > >It is entirely appropriate for any person to raise any question
to
> > > >*any* board member.  Indeed, *every* board member is obligated to
> > > >seek out facts relevant to the corporate activities.
> > >
> > > Also agree.
> >
> >You agree here, yet in your previous email you said that the proper way
was
> >not to address board members individually. Have you had a change of heart
or
> >loss of memory?
>
> No, Chris, I haven't. Go back, and read what exactly Karl has
> written, and where I have agreed.
>
> Veni
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/406 - Release Date: 8/2/06
>
>