Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Danny and all former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,

  Indeed I among I am sure many other or our members as well
as other interested stakeholders/users are concerned as to
violation of contractual obligations a la verisign and Icann. Yet
it seems from Veni's follow on remarks/responsens the ICANN
BoD, or at least Veni is not so concerned or properly concerned.
If so, could it be that the ICANN BoD or Veni is ethically challenged
here?  I believe so.

Danny Younger wrote:

> Veni,
>
> When parties violate their contractual obligation to
> abide by the "Procedure for Subsequent Agreement",
> this is an issue that impacts the entirety of the
> Internet community.  Please stay focused on the real
> problem (which is of much greater import than your
> views on my netiquette).
>
> I have asked an ICANN Board member (yourself), in good
> faith, for guidance on how to best deal with a serious
> matter that now concerns four different registry
> operators.  I look forward to your constructive
> remarks.
>
> Best wishes,
> Danny
>
> --- Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Hi Veni,
> >
> > I'm sure that you realize that it's sometimes easy
> > to
> > overlook a detail.  I hadn't realized that Jeff had
> > unsubscribed from the list.  By the same token, you
> > and your fellow Board members also all overlooked an
> > important detail -- you approved the .com contract
> > without realizing that VeriSign had failed to submit
> > a
> > Renewal Proposal that included operational details,
> > proposed improvements, etc. as required by their
> > contract:
> >
> > "25. Procedure for Subsequent Agreement.  A.
> > Registry
> > Operator may, no earlier than twenty-four and no
> > later
> > than eighteen months prior to the Expiration Date,
> > submit a written proposal to ICANN for the extension
> > of this Agreement for an additional term of four
> > years
> > (the "Renewal Proposal"). The Renewal Proposal shall
> > contain a detailed report of the Registry Operator's
> > operation of the Registry TLD and include a
> > description of any additional Registry Services,
> > proposed improvements to Registry Services, or
> > changes
> > in price or other terms of service.?  See
> >
> http://www.icann.org/tlds/agreements/verisign/registry-agmt-com-25may01.htm
> >
> > So, OK, the Board made a mistake... how does this
> > problem get handled?  I'm not sure that it's fair to
> > ask .info, .biz and .org to now be bound by a
> > requirement that didn't apply to .com.  Is this
> > something for the IRP to look at?  Can the .com
> > agreement be scuttled on the basis of a failure to
> > follow due process?
> >
> > I'd be happy to hear your view.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Danny
> >
> > --- Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > At 04:01 PM 02.8.2006 '?.'  -0400, Neuman, Jeff
> > > wrote:
> > > >FYI, this was not previously posted to the list
> > > although Danny
> > > >referenced it in a previous post
> > >
> > > This is not the first time something like that has
> > > been happening.
> > >
> > > May be next time would be good that Danny posts
> > the
> > > response of the
> > > people he corresponds with, and then his comments.
> > > Otherwise, if
> > > someone is not subscribed to the GA list, he or
> > she
> > > would never know
> > > what comments on his behalf are being made.
> > >
> > > Hope all of you will have good August vacations!
> > >
> > > veni
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827