ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

  • To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract
  • From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 11:59:05 -0400
  • Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • References: <20060802150735.105.qmail@web53307.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

And the consensus I have seen on almost every forum talking about this is NO
GRACE PERIOD. If you misspell a domain name, keep it and redirect it the the
correctly spelt domain name you will now go back and register. They are not
expensive enough for anyone to have to make sure you can spell.

That eliminates the problem altogether. Pretty simple solution, which of
course is why ICANN will never adopt it.

Chris McElroy aka NameCritic

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <vint@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: [ga] Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract


> Dear Jeff,
>
> The proposed .biz contract includes on page 80 the
> following statement:  "Fee for disproportionate
> deletes during Add Grace Period."
>
> The amount of the fee is not stated nor is there a
> definition provided of that which constitutes
> "disproportionate".  Can we talk about this?
>
> While I appreciate the proactive measures that you are
> taking to deal with the "domain tasting" epidemic, I
> remain of the belief that domain name policy issues
> are best dealt with on the basis of a community
> consensus-development process so that potentially
> impacted parties may protect their right to a fair
> hearing.  By enacting fees for disproportionate
> deletes you will be impacting certain businesses and
> registrars that have engaged in the domain tasting
> practice.  While I abhor this particular practice, I
> am of the view that the rights of these parties must
> nonetheless be respected.
>
> I would appreciate your thoughts on the matter.
>
> Best regards,
> Danny Younger
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/405 - Release Date: 8/1/06
>
>




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>