<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] RE: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract
- To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] RE: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: jnevett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vint@xxxxxxxxxx, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, John Jeffrey <jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ComydB8bA6c8/rx4wDVB85Sy4nKEfBf4bEL1KYKF5XYAeN0ZVgjcff6m9HYFhWU5DK1EOCvRzLXU5jKmXtYWtorvyYv+BP9zpldMZPLXGD9OJ4nkuSnOwP2YyMwH3l8oncnBaHj2BY+TgnxH+GBx7ySfDWThXcWLjhl5t9kREZY= ;
- In-reply-to: <C6402C6F0493AA4DBCB9E62F0911E1FC01885626@stntexch06.cis.neustar.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff,
Thank you for the feedback. As you are more
intimately familiar with these documents than I, can
you point me to a uniform definition of what
constitutes "disproportionate"? Or will each registry
through their new service proposals arrive at their
own independent conclusion as to the definition?
Thanks,
Danny
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|