ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] On Individual Representation

  • To: ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [ga] On Individual Representation
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:11:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=G5fQ6UoN9VDp/ms9CdEDbYnJNWeGu2rhDC71b49kcZOHb99j8InWclf7AarP8+mJXyI5FxW2hWkBIaxg72NJ7rDOIZ1uo6qOurDVDu5KKit5ea90OlnXs9UkDTlM2ESTWxOcgRuKCunoRFeXvt/89UxJsDzikmVvN2CXAXY+cr0= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Revolution, evolution and the solution.
   
  The theory being that until the populace has organized themselves, they are not yet ready to participate. This concept is intended to portray the thought that it must be an educated well informed populace before voting on an individual basis is productive. It does not mean that only organizations can vote. As a matter of fact, quite the opposite. ALAC took part of an idea and then twisted it to their own means, i think evil means is probably appropriate, in that clearly it was meant to preserve the power in themselves and deny rights to those entitled.
   
  Well we have quite a different matter here in any event. Here the populace is educated and informed already. The structure is in place already. Security is in place already. The original organizations are disbanded. We are not evolving toward a more democratic process but being stripped of it. There have already been elections and now they are no more.
   
  The bottom line point is; There is absolutely no reason at this stage in the ICANN evolution to require organizations to represent individuals. It is at best intellectual fraud.
   
  e

		
---------------------------------
Bring words and photos together (easily) with
 PhotoMail  - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>