ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: [governance] RALO

  • To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Re: [governance] RALO
  • From: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:14:52 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: Wolfgang Kleinwächter <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <1138116827.8589.78.camel@localhost.localdomain>
  • References: <ACADB74FBBEFD94795A03FDBBDE62D3735A92B@server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de> <1138116827.8589.78.camel@localhost.localdomain>
  • Reply-to: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

But pardon me, if on one side you have ten organizations with a total of
~1000 members, and on the other you have 20 individuals, why should they
have the same weight?

They don't. The 20 individuals outweight the ten organizations, period.

The atomic unit of internet governance is the individual human.

Besides, organizations have a nice warm home in ICANN already, its called the Non-Commercial constituency. In fact there is even a more deeply ensconsed ICANN body whose membership claims to represent every person on the planet - the GAC.

People may chose to form coalitions to express their opinions, but at the end of the day when it comes time to weigh each measure and make decisions the only way to know what people really think is to ask the people themselves, not the organizations that claim to represent them.

The idea that people are only as good as the organizations who represent them, an idea often called corporatism, was an idea that flourished in the 1930's and, fortunately, died during the first half of the 1940's. We don't need to revive it for the internet.

	--karl--




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>