ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [governance] [ga] Re: Establishment of the EuropeanRegionalAt-Large Organization

  • To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [governance] [ga] Re: Establishment of the EuropeanRegionalAt-Large Organization
  • From: Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:35:50 -0500
  • Cc: Governance Caucus <governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <20060122161433.4876.qmail@web53501.mail.yahoo.com>
  • References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060122103802.03a11678@veni.com> <20060122161433.4876.qmail@web53501.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Danny,

At 08:14 22-01-06 -0800, you wrote:
Veni,

You are a member of the Board. You are well aware that
anyone may subscribe to the GA list, including
yourself, and you are also aware that other Board
members have participated on the GA list.  The content
of my message was appropriate for consideration by
members of the GA.

Interesting - when you write to people you don't even tell them you are CC a mailing list, and you don't explain they can subscribe. Further, whether someone will or will not subscribe to a mailing list, should be his/her desire, not being driven by accusations.


It's quite funny that you find your message of interest for the members of the GA, but you don't believe mine, Vittorio, or anyone else who responded there (in the Internet Governance mailing list) messages are of interest for the GA.

I still believe your actions are not proper, and I don't know what made you do them.

You can continue to blame me for whatever you want; but keep in mind I am not a politician, and I don't fight for my ratings. In the meantime, though, I can't stand and watch you attacking =people, whose only fault is they are trying to do something - including trying to make ICANN better.

A quick view of the GA archives shows that none of the comments from Wolfgang, Patrick, Rudi, etc. have made it to the GA list. That's certainly not fair. I will not be writing to the GA list more, as this is not my intent, but I wanted people there to know there's a discussion, and you are quoting only portions of it.

veni





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>