Re: [ga] Vint: on the basic rationale for adding TLDs and any contra-indications
Karl, Interesting computations (using RIPE and other serious sources published figures): - If _every_and_more_ users (1 billion) got a copy of the root file every month the root related traffic would _decrease_ by 90%. - 70 updates of the root file a year. Hundred of thousands of downloaded copies not by far not always updated. Maybe 200 or more versions in use. ICANN is the primary (and only) alt-root. - a stop of the root server system would address the bugs leading to 97.5% of illegitimate calls. The impact on the Internet usage could be low or nil: people would quickly learn from TV or friend's how to build themselves a fool proof config if At 18:39 17/12/2005, Karl Auerbach wrote: On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, M. Morfin wrote:the real issue is to keep the TLD base updated. Not a big deal if you use a script collecting the data from the TLD Managers (there is today less than 70 root update a year). Actually, would someone develop a user smart resolver under Windows all this should be automated for every user, everyone having his own root. ICANN really exists because Windoz does not support an easy nameserver. Otherwise we would have thousands of TLDs and free DNs as part of low cost intelligent network services. jfc
|