ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] TOR for New gTLDs: Public Comments 6 Dec to 9 January

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] TOR for New gTLDs: Public Comments 6 Dec to 9 January
  • From: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:09:34 +0100
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)

[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]

ICANN opens public comment period on the Terms of Reference for New gTLDs Policy Development Process of the GNSO Council.
06 December 2005
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-06dec05.htm
gNSO Home Page: http://gnso.icann.org/
Call for comments on gNSOwebsite:
http://gnso.icann.org/comments-request/



The ICANN bylaws require a public comment period of 20 days following the iniation of a PDP.
http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-08apr05.htm#AnnexA


Terms of Reference for New gTLDs

1. Should new generic top level domain names be
introduced?

a. Given the information provided here and any
other relevant information available to the GNSO, the GNSO should assesswhether there is sufficient support within the Internet community toenable the introduction of new top level domains. If this is the case
the following additional terms of reference are applicable.


2. Selection Criteria for New Top Level Domains
a. Taking into account the existing selection
criteria from previous top level domain application processes and relevant criteria in registry services re-allocations, develop modified or new criteria which specifically address ICANN's goals of expanding the use and usability of the Internet. In particular, examine ways in which the allocation of new top level domains can meet demands for broader use of the Internet in developing countries.


b. Examine whether preferential selection  criteria
(e.g. sponsored) could be developed which would encourage new and
innovative ways of addressing the needs of Internet users.

c. Examine whether additional criteria need to be developed which address ICANN's goals of ensuring the security and stability of the Internet.

3. Allocation Methods for New Top Level Domains

a. Using the experience gained in previous rounds, develop
allocation methods for selecting new top level domain names.

b. Examine the full range of allocation methods including auctions, ballots, first-come first-served and comparative evaluation to determine the methods of allocation that best enhance user choice while
not compromising predictability and stability.


c. Examine how allocation methods could be used to achieve
ICANN's goals of fostering competition in domain name registration
services and encouraging a diverse range of registry services  providers.

4  Policy to Guide Contractual Conditions for New Top Level Domains

a. Using the experience of previous rounds of top level domain name application processes and the recent amendments to registry services agreements, develop policies to guide the contractual criteria which are publicly available prior to any application rounds.

b. Determine what policies are necessary to provide security and stability of registry services.

c. Determine appropriate policies to guide a contractual compliance programme for registry services.


The "Issues Report" for this PDP is available at: <http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/gnso-issues-rpt-gtlds-05dec05.pdf>.


The public comment period is from 6 December 2005 to 9 January 2006.

Comments may be submitted to the email address <new-gtlds-pdp-comments@xxxxxxxxx>

Comments submitted may be viewed at <http://forum.icann.org/lists/new-gtlds-pdp-comments>

--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>