<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] A Monroe Doctrine for the Internet
- To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] A Monroe Doctrine for the Internet
- From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:35:34 -0000
- Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20051105141618.75393.qmail@web53511.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Danny, are you American? Go figure...
But seriously, I am willing to see a continuing use of ICANN (with some
desired reforms) but there is no logic to the idea that ICANN has to have
just one "current steward" - the US.
Danny, I am not American. I do not think that the rest of the world should
be satisfied with ICANN being accountable only to *your* country.
Whatever makes Americans think that that's OK?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> As for me, while I can find some reasons for
> dissatisfaction with the current administration of the
> root, I cannot find a sufficient number of convincing
> reasons to delegate the stewardship of the root to an
> entity other than its current steward.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|