ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] RE: Bylaws Change Requested -- The At-Large Requires Representation

  • To: "M. Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] RE: Bylaws Change Requested -- The At-Large Requires Representation
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 01:06:38 -0700
  • Cc: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, vint@xxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
  • References: <200510201204.j9KC4RQb006952@smtp.google.com> <20051020124446.58607.qmail@web53510.mail.yahoo.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20051024132352.0437fc40@mail.club-internet.fr>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Jefsey and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

This is nonsense Jefsey!  What does any of  your response have to do with
a bylaws change request/requirement as it relates to .INT?

M. Morfin wrote:

> At 14:44 20/10/2005, Danny Younger wrote:
> >Vint,
> >I share your view that a very small fraction of the
> >billion or so reported Internet users actually want to
> >provide input.
>
> Danny,
> I disagree with that. The questions are "what is an input", "what is
> its purpose", "what is the cost" and "what is the collection channel"?
>
> The users do provide inputs. First in using. Then in the way they
> use. Then in what they are ready to pay. Also by comparison with
> mobile, cable TV, etc.
>
> What is really at stake with ICANN is a lack of technical analysis.
> What is important for the internet is not so much the way it works.
> But the way the users think it works. The way it works has a software
> clearing house (IANA) to support it. ICANN has confused its role: it
> should have been the "IANA for the brainware", not to be a domain
> name "industry" association.
>
> This is what is really discussed at the WSIS, a forum where the users
> can document themselves to themselves. ICANN could have done it. It
> still can share in it. But ICANN (and IETF) by their US nexus have
> difficulty to switch from "AmerICANN" to multiculturalism. The real
> issue is therefore deeper and simpler. We see it with the IDN failure.
>
> The diagnosis is clear (Peace Nobel Price):
> http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2005/10/06/64579.html
> The WSIS just tries to prevent us from the Internet bleak society.
>
> The root of the problem is not the DNS root, but RFC 1766, 3066, etc.
> which confuse internationalisation (all the computers to speak an
> underlaying English) and multiculturalization (the e-communications
> empowerment of the persons' communities).
>
> The decision is not at the WSIS, ICANN/GNSO/GA, etc. but it is to
> know if Google, Yahoo!, Verisign will understand their business
> interest as services providers (with 70% of non-English speakers).
> The future board of Unicode will be the real indication. And how the
> IANA will transform.
> jfc

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>