<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] The Disappearance of ALAC's Forum Archives
- To: "sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] The Disappearance of ALAC's Forum Archives
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:51:30 -0800
- Cc: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, icann board address <icann-board@xxxxxxxxx>, Paul Twomey <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>, Kathy Smith <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, james tierney <james.tierney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <001701c51435$c0f3ea00$7d30fd3e@richard> <4213603D.3010707@hermesnetwork.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sotiris and all former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,
Your most likely correct in your evaluatiaon/remarks below, Sotiris.
But there inlies the crux of the problem, doesn't it?
Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:
> Richard et al.,
>
> Why bother pointing any of this out? Do you really think anyone in
> ICANN (ALAC or not) gives a s**t? I'd be surprised if any of them even
> deign to respond to your observations, let alone consider any corrective
> measure(s). LOL!
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> Richard Henderson wrote:
> > I thought I would look back at the contributions anyone had taken the
> > time and trouble to send to one of the ALAC forums in 2004, and to
> > analyse how much of a "graveyard" the ALAC forums had become.
> >
> > First I went to:
> > http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/
> >
> > 15 posts between Oct 16 and Feb 16 (if you exclude spam). That is barely
> > one post a week (and over half of those were from Danny Younger or myself).
> >
> > So then I clicked on the link on that page which says: "Messages posted
> > prior to 1 Oct 2004". This took me here:
> > http://forum.icann.org/old-alac-forum/
> >
> > Now I thought I could read through all the older messages which I and
> > others had sent prior to Oct last year.
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding Domain Name Registration Issues. But oh-oh... "Page
> > cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding WHOIS. Oh-oh again... "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding SPAM. Well oh-oh... "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding IDNs... oops, no I didn't... no comments were ever
> > submitted so there is no link
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding New TLDs. And oh-oh... "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding WIPO. Same again - oh-oh... "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding WSIS. Guess! Oh-oh... "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding Registry Service Changes... Yawn, oh-oh... "Page
> > cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding Verisign. Dur - oh-oh... "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Miscellaneous Comments. Any chance here? Nope, oh-oh... "Page cannot be
> > found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Comments regarding At Large Organizing. Thousands of posts here surely,
> > but no, oh-oh... "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > I clicked on:
> > Two other links but all roads led to: "Page cannot be found"
> >
> > In short, it seems as if all the posts submitted to the ALAC forum prior
> > to October 2004 have *VANISHED* in the twinkling of an eye. Please could
> > we have them back? I think it is widely accepted that messages sent to
> > the ICANN's various mailing lists and fora should be archived and
> > available for review in an open and transparent fashion.
> >
> > I admit that the ALAC forum is a graveyard. But we should still be able
> > to go and lay flowers, and remember, and say a little prayer for the At
> > Large. Does this mean that one day any other ICANN archive can just be
> > removed and disappear without trace?
> >
> > Yrs,
> >
> > Richard Henderson
>
> --
> This email includes a valid digital signature which positively
> distinguishes the sender and serves to ensure that the message has not
> been altered since it was sent. For more information on having your
> identity validated for use in your own Personal Certificate visit the
> THAWTE Web of Trust (WOT): https://www.thawte.com/wot/index.html
>
> This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
> not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
> copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
> intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in
> error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Name: sotiris.vcf
> sotiris.vcf Type: VCard (text/x-vcard)
> Encoding: 7bit
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|