Re: [ga] Priority

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,

  Esther like her one time partner during the failed ALSC experiment
has never been interested in individual open and transparent as well
as equal participation in the policy determination and decisions
of ICANN.  Leopards don't change their spots, despite their
musings to the contrary for public consumption...

Hugh Dierker wrote:

>   I find this post by Dyson telling regarding where priorities lie.
> For me the priority is individual representation.
> For Dyson, an American, it is the independence from the US gov.
> http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00909.html
>
> >From what I have witnessed the DoC and the rest of US gov have left
> ICANN completely alone with only fact finding monitoring going on.
> From what I have witnesses ICANN through ALAC has completeley left the
> individual out.
>
> What are your priorities?
> (doesn't my header look like a spam?;-}
>
> Eric

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827