ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Priority

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] Priority
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 06:44:16 -0800 (PST)
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=eqzFW9p0eG7BKP/XoIPCFC4mXHD6O5ELm2/Rn96p4wPlyen7IRXPZXC43SipDspUTCeGjBNN3P+R+TRvNFArGLHbyG4KmP09/dizpaQXZuNSsfbwrcie8QmJQMpNKzpZY6vCsV//2VjUhlp7EhCiCqWbiR2ks0OyhwKOR7kHUws= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I find this post by Dyson telling regarding where priorities lie.
For me the priority is individual representation.
For Dyson, an American, it is the independence from the US gov.
http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00909.html
 
>From what I have witnessed the DoC and the rest of US gov have left ICANN completely alone with only fact finding monitoring going on. From what I have witnesses ICANN through ALAC has completeley left the individual out.
 
What are your priorities?
(doesn't my header look like a spam?;-}
 
Eric

		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>