Re: [ga] Deletion lists only help
Hugh Dierker wrote: Good point. Jobbers, warehouseman and the like take a dim view when the storage or shipment which they do, even though they do not own but store or ship, is not paid for by the owner or recipient. Actually, I think the postal service would make a better analogy for our present purposes than your jobbers/warehousemen. Here in Canada, as I imagine happens in most countries with a postal service, if a package is unclaimed or a recipient cannot be found for a package sent by post (i.e. postage has been paid), it is returned to sender. The post office does not levy a fee for the process of returning to sender, as postage has already been paid but intended delivery was not made, thus necessitating a return to source. In the domain name business, the source is the registry. I mean, what would happen if every package/letter that went undelivered by the postal service were to instead be appropriated by the postal service? Here is a quote from the CANADA POST CORPORATION ACT RE: Undeliverable and Redirected Mail Regulations INTERNATIONAL UNDELIVERABLE MAIL "15. (1) <http://laws.justice.gc.ca/fr/C-10/C.R.C.-ch.1298/163287.html#article-15> Undeliverable mail posted elsewhere than in Canada shall be dealt with as follows: (a) where the mail was posted in Australia, Great Britain (including Northern Ireland), the Republic of Ireland, Mexico or the United States with postage thereon paid at the current rate of postage for letters in that country and where the mail bears a return address, with or without a request for return, the mail shall be returned directly to the sender;" Why should the registrar, who has aleady levied their fee upon initial registration/transfer/whatever have *any* claim against any given registration which it helps to effect? Sotiris Sotiropoulos Uniform Commercial Code has many laws covering these matters. Attachment:
smime.p7s
|