Re: [ga] Wrong and Wright, newest lawfirm in town
- To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>, Kathy Smith <KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, james tierney <james.tierney@xxxxxxxxx>, Don Evans <DEvans@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Wrong and Wright, newest lawfirm in town
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:37:40 -0700
- Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bill Oreilly <Oreilly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
I take it the you are equating the fictitious law firm "Wrong and
with Jones and Day.. Given that is so, than of course most rational
"Good ole boys" or otherwise Stakeholders/users, expect a high level
of ethics from the legal firms that represent government contracted
entities such as ICANN, to adhere to the law at ALL times.
as we have all seen on this and many other public forums, and from
testimony in the House Telecom committee especially, Law firms like
Jones and Day have other agenda's that are of a variety other than
what is represented as seen now recently again with the "Google
Affair" and leaking of memos by Jones and Day legal rep's to the
media regarding their client, Google...
Yet it seems and has seemed that our government officials have
failed to act yet again to what has become a pattern of such very
questionable behavior on the part of Jones & Day, as well as
ICANN... When, I and our members wonder, will some direct
and effective action on the part of DOC/NTIA and/or the DOJ
be forthcoming in correcting such illegal behavior...???
So I can only hearken back to Bill O'reilly's book, whos looking
out for you?? Google? No it doesn't seem so. ICANN? Not
hardly.. Jones & Day? Forget it! DOJ and/or DOC/NTIA?
Well, not yet anyway.. So what is it again we are paying these
people? Hummmmm??? Way too much perhaps??
Oh yes, and umm, what ever happened to "PUBLIC SERVICE"???
Hugh Dierker wrote:
> Jiminey jiminey.
> Truth be told I am just an old boy. I think goin fishin is better if
> you don't catch no fish to clean and get ta eat mommas fries.
> But by golly dangit those gang kids tagged my wifes office and our
> store Vien Dong has been vandalized by the same gang. Ah shoot they
> are just little guys I have been watching grow up. So I get on the
> phone and try to work with the SD gang unit. At least the gang is
> If you think this is irrelavant look and Jones and Day. The same
> injunction laws apply to them as they do to gangs. If you are someone
> that organizes yourself under the laws you are bound to follow the
> other laws.
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827