ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members

  • To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] request for details about ALAC members
  • From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: froomkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, NVICTORY@xxxxxxxxxxxx, RLayton@xxxxxxxxxxxx, censslin@xxxxxxxxxxxx, DEvans@xxxxxxx, KSMITH@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <3F84E4D6.E90C9C54@ix.netcom.com>
  • References: <3F84E4D6.E90C9C54@ix.netcom.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Michael and all former DNSO GA members or other stakeholders/users,
> 
>   I think the more relevant issue or point that Kristy has again
> raised, it why should a obviously illegitimate ALAC be given
> or allowed any "power" of any kind when it does not represent
> any and all "Interested parties" or stakeholders/users unencumbered?
> 

Power and legitimacy are clearly different.

Eric




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>