<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN's accredited registrars and trying to renew one name
- To: "L. Gallegos" <jandl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN's accredited registrars and trying to renew one name
- From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 21:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxx>, Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <3F4D2393.32105.4B90CB74@localhost>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If this were true domains would be like trademarks, take years to get and
cost thousands of dollars/yen/pesos. If it were like that the internet
would just have a few thousand hosts on it and e-mail would have probably
never been developed.
be careful for what you wish for...
-rick
> That's why I think the registry should have ultimate responsibility to
> ensure the integrity of the registration if the registrar proves to be
> incompetant or unwilling to correct its own errors. In a case where a
> registrant is not "allowed" to renew due to a technical issue or lack
> of phone access, the registry should immediately correct the situation
> and not create a loss for the registrant. If they do not act, the
> registry should be held liable.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|