<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICANN's accredited registrars and trying to renew one name
- To: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "L. Gallegos" <jandl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICANN's accredited registrars and trying to renew one name
- From: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:07:14 +1200
- Cc: Richard Henderson <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308271631560.20747-100000@npax.cavebear.com >
- References: <3F4B8CC7.21034.455DA268@localhost>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
At 12:11 p.m. 28/08/2003, Karl Auerbach wrote:
If your registrar has a contract under which you have agreed to limit the
liability of the registrar, then switch registrars to one that puts no
such limitation in their contract.
Please let us know when you find one. :-)
ccTLD's that have introduced a "shared registry" system leaving a thin
registry will have to cope with similar oversight responsibilities over
potentially lawless but "accredited" registrars.
-joop-
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|