<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] @xxxxxxxxx
Dave and all former DNSO GA members,
DPF wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:11:14 -0700, crispin@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > 4) I believe that you have seriously overstated the magnititude of
> > the problem you have identified. Any person who is a member of a
> > list has complete access to all the addresses ever published; the
> > primary purpose of the list archives is to provide a record of
> > public discussion, not to provide a convenient directory for
> > participants email addresses.
> >
> > 5) And there are essentially trivial workarounds for anyone who really
> > feels that their address must be visible in the archives -- they could
> > simply use your trick, or give a URL.
> >
> >As in most things, there are tradeoffs. In my opinion the tradeoffs in
> >this case come down very strongly on the side I have described.
>
> FWIW I totally agree with Kent on this issuep.
I also agree with Kent on this spicific issue as well.
>
>
> DPF
> --
> E-mail: david@xxxxxxxxxx
> ICQ: 29964527
> MSN: dpf666@xxxxxxxxxxx
Regardsp,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|