<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: (was - Web address ] Paul Twomey and Responsiveness
- To: "Roberto Gaetano" <ploki_xyz@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: (was - Web address ] Paul Twomey and Responsiveness
- From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:26:40 +0100
- Cc: <ga@xxxxxxxx>, <twomey@xxxxxxxxx>
- References: <Law15-F30GCWznNBGpc0002ccb0@hotmail.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: Roberto Gaetano <ploki_xyz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> >Thanks for your substantive mail, Karl, which I have snipped! Your new
> >confidence in Paul Twomey is heartening but as yet to be demonstrated.
> >
Roberto wrote:
> For the record, I share Karl's optimism.
> Long time ago, two GAC reps stood up in an ICANN meeting, claiming that
> ICANN had to be more responsive to the user community. One of the two is
> Paul Twomey.
Fine, Roberto
You may be right...
Can Paul explain why, 45 days after I mailed him on a legitimate concern, I
haven't even had a response?
The legitimate concern was, that 425 days after I mailed Dan Halloran on a
legitimate concern, I hadn't had a response.
Paul may have stood up and said that ICANN should be "more responsive" to
the user community, but that's not a lot of good... if he doesn't respond!!!
yrs,
Richard Henderson
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|