Re: [ga] "Intervenor" fees. Has ICANN/WIPO followed Calif's. Insurance industry?

[Jeffrey Williams <jwkckid2@xxxxxxxxx>]

Matt and all,

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Matthew Pemble <matthew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Reply deliberately to list ...
>
> On 8 May 2012 23:43, Jeffrey Williams <jwkckid2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Matt and all,
>>
>>   This thread was meant as a list question as it was originally posted as
>> such.  I didn't take it off
>> list.
>>
>
> Your email of "Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 07:52:30 -0700" was sent to me not
> to the list. Check your sent folder. You'll also notice it isn't headed
> "Matt  and all" so you did not _just_ miss off the list address by
> accident. You are either mistaken or lying.
>

  It "Should" have gone to the list.  If it didn't than I cannot account
for the reason as I am not the list manager.

>
> I'd suggest you check the list archives (where it also does not appear)
> but then you think those are being maliciously censored.
>

  Censoring has occured here in the past for various reasons.  Some "May"
have been malicious as in the past I believed
that some were, but that is not certain of course.  Others claimed same and
corrective steps were taken to rectify the
matter effectively all be same a bit delayed.

>
>   It is only a question, not a statement.
>>
>
> Excluding the link and the quote, your original post makes an assertion
> then asks three questions. You know this. The assertion ends with a full
> stop. The three following questions end with question marks. I object to
> the lack of evidence for the assertion.
>

  No assertion was made Matt that is a figment of your imagination.  Very
clever though.  Here are a very few links in this respect
 anyway:
http://achristie.com/udrp-transfer-can-be-overturned-under-acpa-due-to-misleading-evidence/
http://www.kayescholer.com/news/publications/2007042/_res/id=sa_File1/DomainNameArbitrationsRB07232007.pdf

http://www.elliotsblog.com/tom-rask-on-the-udrp-process4750
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Domain-Name_Dispute-Resolution_Policy
Several references here
http://icannwiki.com/index.php?title=WIPO#cite_note-34
http://icannwiki.com/index.php/Fabulous.com
http://icannwiki.com/index.php?title=WIPO#cite_note-36

Kindest regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the
accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 4/18/12
CISO
Phone: 214-245-2647




>
>> Yet comparisons have been, are being, and will
>> likely continue to be at least considered if not asserted in or out of
>> context.
>>
>
> You seem to be the only person comparing the UDRP to the practices of the
> Californian insurance industry. I fail to see the connection - the
> "consumer advocate" practice you resent in the latter case has no obvious
> parallel in UDRP.
>
> M.
>
> --
> Matthew Pemble
> Technical Director, Idrach Ltd
>
> Mobile: +44 (0) 7595 652175
> Office: + 44 (0) 1324 820690
>