Re: [ga] Fate of new TLDs to be settled in private

[Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>]

And now Bradley is telling fibs that Joe Baptista is passed away. I don't think 
so, since I see him posting on
some Ontario lists just in January. So who is using the drugs at this point, 
hmmm hmmm....

 BAX! Names Allentown
http://www.bax-names-allentown.com
Computer setup, training, software and services
Coming soon: BAX-Mail - free web email under the BAX TLD.




________________________________
From: Eric Dierker <ericdierker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Bradley D. Thornton <Bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thomas Baxter 
<baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eddan@xxxxxxx; governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gwen@xxxxxxx; 
jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx; karl.peters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lauren@xxxxxxxx; 
lmcknigh@xxxxxxx; ehale2@xxxxxxx; froomkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mueller@xxxxxxx; 
wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx; Jeff Williams (INEG Group) <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 9:34:50 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Fate of new TLDs to be settled in private


Does it appear to anyone else?  (And I do not like to speak of the 
personalities 
but rather the issues - mine being so flawed, the former that is - that I would 
always lose ;-)
 
That in this particular instance, just perhaps, the personal issues overshadow 
the technical and policy issues?
 
How I read Baxter made sense, to me. If I pick out the issues from the 
flak/chaff of Thornton it does not seem innopposite in purpose or practice.
 
Can someone tell me if the only conflict here is personal as opposed to real 
(not that personal is not real, but you know what I mean)
 
Eric




________________________________
 From: Bradley D. Thornton <Bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eddan@xxxxxxx; ericdierker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gwen@xxxxxxx; jeffrey@xxxxxxxxx; 
karl.peters@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lauren@xxxxxxxx; lmcknigh@xxxxxxx; 
ehale2@xxxxxxx; froomkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mueller@xxxxxxx; wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx; 
Jeff 
Williams (INEG Group) <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, February 11, 2011 1:42:01 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] Fate of new TLDs to be settled in private

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

I see you're still smoking crack Tom.

Try reading the documentation on the site sometime you bonehead.

TLDA  is a trade organization promoting and supporting the interests of
TLDA Holders, and the base of Internet users at large.

It's not affiliated with ANY RSC, nor does it operate a root - it merely
publishes the TapRoot, a non-operational list of all known, non-collding
TLDs as a service to the community, in an effort to avoid collisions and
unify AUTH zone data.

Dude. C'mon, get with the program.

On 02/10/2011 07:30 PM, Thomas Baxter wrote:

> 
> Now that INAIC and TLDA are one (http://www.tlda.org) it appears, maybe we can


> (byte it kookey joe - you finally loose the war).

Well, you were right on that point. But it's not nice to pick on dead
people - Joe Baptista died sometime last year.

> 
> For now, I have to fix a brokan window 

Yeah, you go ahead and do that Tom, coz your domain below  doesn't
resolve ;)

>  BAX! Names  Allentown
> http://www.bax-names-allentown.com
> Computer setup, training, software and services
> Coming soon: BAX-Mail - free web email under the BAX TLD.

- -- 
Bradley D. Thornton
Manager Network Services
NorthTech Computer
TEL: +1.760.666.2703  (US)
TEL: +44.702.405.1909 (UK)
http://NorthTech.US

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Find this cert at x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

iQEcBAEBAwAGBQJNVQRpAAoJEE1wgkIhr9j3WKUIALFDHCew8kqocZilATEixr6X
ICNnDmT9eQHwNBmeSMPq2NWzLdNpwZss00zvh2dOxHSDBQrNsFB4IScHSsKyLqb+
1PQ1iW3MtDkF1vvafEhxA4RQn9m44lLj4O7K+MsVI5wC5sSWhPGrxkykurPSNh75
CbKCO0ZaiFgw+u7e9sw5vpfDcmyXz5D1SV98wAeYpu5emcS8WtzbUbVLfPFbgomP
KZ9J1nPDS6bFDZyfghJBSxRv87JIDVLVxtQd1BVGLIzwtEMXouQg2zKOBAyVkAAd
YAtSIupvehwkeXSo/pt1yMRXdYGl9JPU7YXC7WgqWsMponQYIKhMO6UM1DXnQHc=
=pZYG
-----END PGP  SIGNATURE-----