ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Experts agree: ICANN staff (and board members) must undergo mandatory drug testing, credit checks, and psych exams

  • To: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO GA Mailing List <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx, icann-board@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Experts agree: ICANN staff (and board members) must undergo mandatory drug testing, credit checks, and psych exams
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:26:51 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

George and all,

  The problem I see with this is that it only applies to those
handling IANA functions which doesn't include ALL of ICANN's
staff nor have a test/evaluation for obesity either.  That's
troublingly insufficient.  Ergo, this is not near good enough
IMPO.  


-----Original Message-----
>From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jun 16, 2010 2:16 PM
>To: GNSO GA Mailing List <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: rod.beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [ga] Experts agree: ICANN staff (and board members) must undergo 
>mandatory drug testing, credit checks, and psych exams
>
>
>Hi folks,
>
>I was pleased to read in the latest report from ICANN that JAS recommended 
>mandatory drug testing, credit checks, and psychiatric exams for staff. See:
>
>http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-16jun10-en.htm  (page 26 of 
>the PDF)
>
>Of course, this should also include Board members.
>
>This is consistent with my own recommendation in April:
>
>http://twitter.com/GeorgeKirikos/status/12644657684
>
>so it's good to see that some of the external consultants read what the public 
>has to say, and draws upon those good ideas.
>
>There is no need to wait for this recommendation to be implemented. Any 
>hesitation would be a sign that drug addicts, psychos and financially stressed 
>individuals are "at large" within ICANN staff and would give them a continuing 
>opportunity to put the DNS at risk. I suggest ICANN's Board put this at the 
>top of their agenda in Brussels. Indeed, new TLD registry operators (and 
>existing ones) should be subject to the same standards. I expect DAGv5 or 
>DAGv6 to include these recommendations.
>
>The only question remains: how big will the exodus from ICANN be in advance of 
>these new recommendations being implemented? 
>
>Sincerely,
>
>George Kirikos
>http://www.leap.com/

Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300+k members/stakeholders and growing, 
strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>