<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: (KMM109596324V97017L0KM)
- To: Yahoo! Mail <mail-abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx, abuse@xxxxxxxxx, info@xxxxxxx, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx, rod_beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx, fbi.dallas@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] Re: (KMM109596324V97017L0KM)
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 17:23:45 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Yahoo abuse and all,
YES the message was sent from Yahoo's! mailing system,
I sent you the headders to demonstrate such. Please discontinue
providing false statements like this ( see yours below ) in the
future, as such represents fraud. Also please be so king as to
clean up your DNS as it is a mess! see again:
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport?domain=yahoo.com&format=raw&loadresults=true&token=26f10721ff4d661002516f091400301c
-----Original Message-----
>From: Yahoo! Mail <mail-abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: May 25, 2010 9:17 AM
>To: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ga] Re: (KMM109596324V97017L0KM)
>
>Hello,
>
>Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Mail.
>
>I understand your frustration in receiving unsolicited email. While we
>investigate all reported violations against the Yahoo! Terms of Service
>(TOS), in this particular case, the message you received was not sent
>through the Yahoo! Mail system.
>
>Yahoo! has no control over activities outside its service, and therefore
>we cannot take action. You may try contacting the sender's email
>provider, by identifying the sender's domain and contacting the
>administrator of that domain. The sender's provider should be in a
>better position to take appropriate action against the sender's account.
>
>The email message itself does contain some information relating to the
>sender's identity. Yahoo! includes the originating Internet Protocol
>(IP) address in the full Internet headers of all messages sent through
>Yahoo! Mail, so that we will have information regarding the origin of
>messages sent through our system. The originating IP address should be
>located in the very last "Received" line of the full Internet headers
>and corresponds to the sender's Internet Service Provider (ISP).
>
>Please see the following URL for more assistance:
>
> http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/original/abuse/abuse-17.htm
>
>Once you have identified the IP address, you can conduct an IP lookup to
>determine which ISP provides this person with Internet access. One such
>lookup tool you may want to try is:
>
> http://www.arin.net/whois/
>
>You can then attempt to contact that ISP to report any abuse activities
>occurring within their service.
>
>In addition, please visit the following website for useful tools to
>combat spam:
>
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/
>
>If we can be of further assistance, please let us know.
>
>Your patience during this process is greatly appreciated.
>
>Thank you again for contacting Yahoo! Mail.
>
>Regards,
>
>Rochelle
>
>Yahoo! Customer Care
>
>71822077
>
>For assistance with all Yahoo! services please visit:
>
> http://help.yahoo.com/
>
>
>
>
>Original Message Follows:
>-------------------------
>
>>>REDFRMCON Case ID: 86451320 Mail Classic General
>
>
>>>REDFRMADV Case ID: 71798847 Mail Abuse General
>
>Hugo and all,
>
> I must agree with you Hugo. But try to remember that there
>are no effective SPAM filters deployed and so we occasionally
>get this kind of nonsense especially from Yahoo or Gmail
>email addresses. Further Yahoo in this instance seems to
>be less than cooperative with the rest of the Internet community
>in keeping it's DNS properly configured, See:
>http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport?domain=yahoo.com&format=raw&loadresults=true&token=2461b6eac906551c34d6f10802f80016
>Further it seems that ICANN's SSAC doesn't seem to be able or willing
>to properly council Yahoo accordingly. One has to wonder why? But to
>make things more interesting we have this 'Offering' from
>Yahoo!, See:http://forum.icann.org/lists/dt-motion-21may08/msg00005.html
>which seems to actually belie Yahoo's! actual practices... Seems also
>that Mr. Evans and Yahoo's! leadership and legal council appear to
>be less than ethical in some aspects of their professional
>responsibilities
>accordingly. A sad comentary indeed! >:(
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Hugo Monteiro <hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: May 23, 2010 10:39 AM
>>To: D Thomas <dnthomas76@xxxxxxxxx>
>>Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [ga] Re:
>>
>>
>>On 05/23/2010 04:43 AM, D Thomas wrote:
>>> http://1info.fimfowunsye.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>I do have to wonder why is this chap still subscribed to this list.
>>Isn't there enough spam already?
>>
>>R's,
>>
>>Hugo Monteiro.
>>
>>--
>>fct.unl.pt:~# cat .signature
>>
>>Hugo Monteiro
>>Email : hugo.monteiro@xxxxxxxxxx
>>Telefone : +351 212948300 Ext.15307
>>Web : http://hmonteiro.net
>>
>>Divisão de Informática
>>Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da
>> Universidade Nova de Lisboa
>>Quinta da Torre 2829-516 Caparica Portugal
>>Telefone: +351 212948596 Fax: +351 212948548
>>www.fct.unl.pt apoio@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>fct.unl.pt:~# _
>>
Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 300+k members/stakeholders and growing,
strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|