ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Dierker NOT Private

  • To: John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Dierker NOT Private
  • From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 17:06:59 -0500 (GMT-05:00)

<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: 
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:
 #ffffff;color: black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>

<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>John and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; Not trying to muddy anything, just pointing out the facts as they are 
available to me.</P>
<P>So were you asking a question, or making a statement?&nbsp; Please 
advise.</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Second, the beef with Angelfire by the complainant of the link I posted</P>
<P>&nbsp;was upheld in court.&nbsp; Enough said?&nbsp; These complaints taken 
to court</P>
<P>have 87% of the time gone&nbsp;against Angelfire, have been upheld.&nbsp; 
Ergo, filtering</P>
<P>the nonsense from the facts once completed, or ongoing,&nbsp;leaves the 
truth for all to</P>
<P>see.&nbsp; In respect to Angelfire, their processes were and are flawed to 
the extent of</P>
<P>being far less than reasonably&nbsp;creditable.&nbsp; Ergo ignoring them is 
prefrable at a </P>
<P>minimum if not advisable.&nbsp; Additionally thankfully and correctly the 
FTC agrees </P>
<P>with same.</P>
<P><BR><BR><BR>&nbsp;</P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: John Palmer 
<JPALMER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: May 23, 2010 4:58 PM <BR>To: 
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <BR>Subject: Re: [ga] Dierker NOT Private <BR><BR> 
<ZZZHTML><ZZZHEAD><ZZZMETA content="text/html; charset=utf-8" 
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<STYLE>BODY {
        FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: arial,sans-serif; 
BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff
}
P {
        MARGIN: 0px
}
</STYLE>
<ZZZMETA content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.5921" name="GENERATOR"></ZZZHEAD><ZZZBODY 
id=compText bgColor="#ffffff">
<DIV>"Jeff":</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>First of all, what does angelfire's non-compliance with someone's opinion 
of</DIV>
<DIV>what should be in a DNS zone file have to do with the contents of a page 
</DIV>
<DIV>put up by one of its customers - answer - NOTHING. Stop trying to 
muddy</DIV>
<DIV>the waters of this issue.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Second, what does a disgruntled Angelfire customer who has a beef 
with</DIV>
<DIV>Angelfire's AUP have to do with the content of a completely different 
</DIV>
<DIV>customer's page (the one with the info of which I speak). Same thing - 
</DIV>
<DIV>you are muddying the waters of the discussion by bringing in non-sense 
</DIV>
<DIV>that has nothing to do with the identity issue:</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>FOCUS ON THE ISSUE, "Jeff". </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Nuff saif about this AFAIC. If you and Hugh want to keep up this 
discussion,</DIV>
<DIV>fine. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I stand by my original statement that identity verification for 
constituency </DIV>
<DIV>membership is a fine idea. That should help mitigate the false-flag 
nonsense</DIV>
<DIV>that ICANN (probably ICANN) is pulling here.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Cheers,</DIV>
<DIV>John<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 
5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: 
black"><B>From:</B> <A title=jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
href="mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx";>Jeffrey A. Williams</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
title=jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
href="mailto:jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>John Palmer</A> ; <A 
title=ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx href="mailto:ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A> ; 
<A title=info@xxxxxxx href="mailto:info@xxxxxxx";>info@xxxxxxx</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, May 23, 2010 4:44 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [ga] Dierker NOT Private</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<P>John and all,</P>
<P>&nbsp;</P>
<P>&nbsp; Indeed it is troubling that you have 'Issues" whatever they may be as 
you are not too</P>
<P>specific or provide any emphrical evidence to same.&nbsp; Hopefully that 
will be forthcoming?</P>
<P>In any event Angelfire's reputation as their DNS config clearly shows are in 
question</P>
<P>technically speeking at least, see: <A 
href="http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport?domain=angelfire.com&amp;format=raw&amp;loadresults=true&amp;token=2541b0e492485e093546230e17377018";>http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport?domain=angelfire.com&amp;format=raw&amp;loadresults=true&amp;token=2541b0e492485e093546230e17377018</A></P>
<P>for further information.&nbsp; Also seems that Angelfire has long been in 
trouble with LEA's and</P>
<P>seemingly remains so, see: <A 
href="http://www.counterpunch.org/angelfire.html";>http://www.counterpunch.org/angelfire.html</A>&nbsp;for
 example.&nbsp; So</P>
<P>perhaps Mr. Palmer you can update your information to something a bit more 
accurate</P>
<P>accordingly, and soon.&nbsp; &gt;:)&nbsp; Further I fail too see what your 
subject line has to do with</P>
<P>your remarks below as well...&nbsp; Care to elaborate more specifically 
please?&nbsp; Thanks</P>
<P>in advance for your cooperation accordingly.&nbsp; &gt;:)<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: John Palmer 
<JPALMER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: May 23, 2010 3:58 PM <BR>To: 
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <BR>Subject: [ga] Dierker NOT Private 
<BR><BR><ZZZHTML><ZZZHEAD><ZZZMETA content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" 
http-equiv="Content-Type"><ZZZMETA content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.5921" 
name="GENERATOR">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</ZZZHEAD><ZZZBODY bgColor="#ffffff">
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hugh:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This isnt a flame war. I have a legitimate concern 
that there are agitators on this list</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>that are not who they say they are and who are 
working against the interests of IDNO's. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>The Angelfire website raises legitimate concerns 
about someone who has done everything</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>he can to obfuscate his identity. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>If we do revamp this constituency, it will have no 
credibility unless all of the cards are</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>layed out on the table in a transparent 
way.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>By the way, this is one of the mantras of your 
buddy Baptista - transparency.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>So, Hugh - why are you opposed to 
transparency?&nbsp; I don't think this is </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>small concern.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>As I have said before, I have SERIOUS questions 
about the identities and motives of</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>several of the folks here.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>John</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; 
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: 
black"><B>From:</B> <A title=hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx 
href="mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx";>Hugh Dierker</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A 
title=jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
href="mailto:jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>John Palmer</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, May 21, 2010 8:35 AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Palmer NOT Private</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV>Mr. Palmer</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Please do not start to derail and obfiscate work being done here with 
starting your own personal flaming wars. The identification process spoken of 
is for membership in a constituency. It is not for this list. If you were not 
so blinded by your obvious hate mongering and narrow personal vendettas you 
would see that. You have already made it clear that you are driven my ego and 
fear, and not to benefit anyone but yourself.&nbsp;Further attacks will not be 
censored or banned but you will make yourself invisible by your childlike 
behavior.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>If you continue down this road I will post all your private posts that 
show just how obsessed you are. I write this offlist not as private but as to 
keep it off list.<BR><BR>--- On <B>Thu, 5/20/10, John Palmer 
<I>&lt;jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;</I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: 
rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid"><BR>From: John Palmer 
&lt;jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<BR>Subject: Re: [ga] |Going forward 
towards a Registrant's Constituency<BR>To: sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Date: Thursday, May 20, 2010, 12:07 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail><BR>I think that this is a FANTASTIC idea. I have strong 
reason to beleive that we have dire need to verify the identity of at least one 
person on this list (one who is a frequent poster).&nbsp; <BR>Seeing as how 
there is a whole website that PROVES that his<BR>previous addresses were 
nothing but empty lots, etc, I think<BR>that requiring proof of identity is 
fantastic.<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR>John<BR><BR>----- Original Message ----- From: 
&lt;<A 
href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
ymailto="mailto:sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR>To:
 &lt;<A href="http://us.mc529.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; 
ymailto="mailto:ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>&gt;<BR>Sent: Thursday, 
May 20, 2010 1:45 PM<BR>Subject: [ga] |Going forward towards a Registrant's 
Constituency<BR><BR><BR><BR>First, let's thank Joop for offering up the IDNO 
charter for us to use as<BR>a basis for an RC charter.<BR><BR>Next, let's get 
one piece of fundamental business out ofthe way. When i<BR>voted in the ICANN 
2000 AtLarge election, it was only after my identity<BR>had been verified and a 
letter had been sent to my physical address with<BR>my acct/password info for 
voting day. In order for us to move forward on<BR>creating an RC we need to 
VERIFY that the prospective membership is who<BR>they say they are. 
Fortunately, there are many options available for us<BR>today. My preference 
would be for a digital certificate. Does anyone have<BR>any problem with being 
required to provide proof of one's identity in<BR>order to participate in a 
Registrant's Constituency? If anyone does have a<BR>problem, the solution is 
simple, they can form their own constituency of<BR>non-identities. I am willing 
to put the work into an RC but only with<BR>other verified individuals. So, 
who's willing to join me in this<BR>endeavour?<BR><BR>Sotiris 
Sotiropoulos<BR><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P><BR>&nbsp;</P>
<P>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 
294k members/stakeholders and growing, strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the 
greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go 
with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of 
glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, 
L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L 
multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. 
Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. 
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good 
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone: 
214-244-4827<BR>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup 
LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders and growing, strong!)<BR>"Obedience of 
the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Abraham 
Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what 
is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the 
probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends 
upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than 
PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing&nbsp; (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. 
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng.&nbsp; INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good 
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone: 
214-244-4827<BR></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>