<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain
- To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Pressure Mounts On ICANN To Approve .xxx Domain
- From: Matthew Pemble <matthew@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 00:20:06 +0100
Folks,
On 6 May 2010 20:23, Jeffrey A. Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> If this bit of news wasn't so tragic is would be humorous.
> Frankly a better argument in favor of .xxx would be based
> on discrimination or repressing expression/speach. I personally
> am against promoting in any way, porn on the Internet. .xxx
> will not help one bit in supressing porn on the Internet as
> ccTLD's and other gTLD's such as .biz, .info, .net, .com, .org,
> all already have a huge number of domain names registered that
> provide various types of porn. so parents simply blocking .xxx
> domain names will do little, if anything at all in preventing
> their children from viewing porn. Yet I can also see how ICANN
> is kind of "up against it" as it were, with this delema. Dammed
> if they approve it, and dammed if they don't. But will $$ trump
> principal or which principal has superior consideration?
>
I agree with Jeff's argument entirely - I just wonder about 'principle' as
opposed to 'fairness' and Hugh's 'prurience' - porn is with us, regardless.
M.
--
Matthew Pemble
Technical Director, Idrach Ltd
Mobile: +44 (0) 7595 652175
Office: + 44 (0) 1324 820690
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|