RE: [ga] This list.....

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for clearing this up. I along with others thought you got a kind of 
Kent Crispin or Roberto reward. So now we know that your kicking Jeff off the 
list with the help of Kent was purely a random act. I am glad Avri finally 
righted that wrong.

--- On Fri, 4/30/10, Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [ga] This list.....
To: "'Joe Baptista'" <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, April 30, 2010, 11:04 AM



That working group completed its work some 2.5 years ago and prior to my 
participation within the GA .  It has since been disbanded. I was an invited 
observer only - courtesy of the UK GAC rep at that time.
 
I am not active in any other ICANN WGs and have received no "cookies".




From: publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Joe Baptista
Sent: 30 April 2010 16:31
To: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] This list.....





On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:



You are indeed wrong!

??? http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/jointwg.htm

regards
joe baptista
 







From: publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Joe Baptista
Sent: 30 April 2010 16:08 



To: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] This list.....





I may be wrong Debbie. Maybe ICANN didn't give you a cookie. But I clearly 
remember you being appointed or posted to some IDN working group. Am I mistaken?

cheers
joe

p.s. when you get your doctorate - let me know and I'll add you to the doctorQ. 
And don't forget if you want to play dictator here you need to get your pals at 
ICANN to deliver on their promises and provide us the necessary facilities.


On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:




Joe wrote:
 
"But you did. After you resigned as list monitor what committee were you 
appointed to? You can answer that one for us."
 
I have not been appointed to any ICANN committees.  I am too busy with my 
PhD.  Imagine that... I will be able to call myself Dr. Debbie... Gosh... I 
really will fit in well here with all you other Doctors 
 
;-)
 
Debbie






From: publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:publicroot.info@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Joe Baptista
Sent: 29 April 2010 13:23
To: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 



Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] This list.....








On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Debbie Garside <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:




Joe wrote:
 
"She must be a good negotiator - she has been well rewarded. "
 
How so?  As far as I know I have not received any rewards, inducements, 
incentives or anything else you would like to accuse me of whilst I was List 
Monitor.  I have not received any rewards either prior to or since - just in 
case you were wondering :-)

But you did. After you resigned as list monitor what committee were you 
appointed to? You can answer that one for us.
 



 
It would seem that people here miss my style of "dictatorship".  

If you feel thats the case - then run for chair. Any support you think you have 
will be tabulated in the votes.

As for the above statement - I hope your not begging me again to be list 
monitor. You made a farce of this list - it's rules and processes - and the 
agreements we had between us plus chair

A ruling was made that the allegations by an icann staff member (Patrick I 
think it was) were vexatious. You overruled our decision and made a farce of it 
all. So you have lost my trust.

But you may very well be right. This place may need a dictatorship. Let's vote.

Speak to your ICANN masters - just follow the leash from collar to hand - tell 
them to give us our voting rights and provide the facilities to vote - and you 
can offer yourself up as Chair.





I have to say, I don't read this list very often, and I don't miss it either.

I bet you read it all the time ... late at night ... under the covers ... while 
pacing yourself with chatroulette. Just kidding ;)

Seriously Debbie. I think the stunt you pulled as monitor and the small morsel 
you got back for it was not worth the effort.

You made it very clear back then your intent was to kill the GA. It didn't 
work. But as Chair you may be able to swing it.

kindest regards
joe baptista

 


 
Debbie
 




From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe 
Baptista
Sent: 29 April 2010 03:25
To: ken stubbs
Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ga] This list.....





Ken. What a pleasure to see you speak up. There must be a fire somewhere.

Your someone who is very close to ICANN. Tell them we need them to provide 
their side of the bargain and give us our right to vote back. You want a civil 
forum - we need an election.

Also I have lost complete faith with ICANN since the Debbie incident. She must 
be a good negotiator - she has been well rewarded. I'm glad in fact that is the 
case because she did a good job of showing everyone on the GA what a 
dictatorship would be like under debbie. Thank God she resigned. Did you 
engineer that bit of nonsense.

Anyway ... send it up the pipe. Time for an election.

regards
joe baptista


On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, ken stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Ken Stubbs wrote:

I have been a subscriber to this list for almost 12 years now and have
seen
the value diminsh significantly because of threads like this one..

Its sad to see a forum for discussion, (purportedly ICANN related),
degenerate
to this level.

Hopefully subscribers can still find some value in it, but, I am
rapidly losing hope that
this goal is attainable..



On 4/28/2010 2:26 PM, Thomas Baxter wrote:

>AHA
>- Here you can see more of joes lieing - Joe send an e-mail to this law
>>person and TELLS the law person that HE (joe) is thinking that some
>laws are
>>broke and impys this to the law person.
>
>>The law person being political, wants to say "YES, HUMMM HUMMM" and not
>>contredect some member of the public and then tell joe that if there is
>a criminal
>>that ok, to call the police.
>
>>Notice that the law person DID NOT SAY THAT THEY AGREED OR KNOWS ANY
>>INDEPENDENCE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS - ONLY THEY LISTEND TO JOES VERSION
>>AND RELYED ON THIS ONLY.
>
>>Do you all see the nature of this scams from Joe - do you see how he
>trys to
>>lie and fool all persons? He tries to make you think that the person
>WAS SAYING
>>THAT THERE IS A BROKE LAW AND CRIMINALS AND AGREES WITH JOE - THAT
>>IS **********NOT************** AT ALL WHAT THE POLITICIEN SAID -
>>READ THIS CAREFULY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>>BEWARE.
>
>
>BAX! Names Allentown






-- 
Joe Baptista

www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & 
Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
 Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
    Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084

Personal: http://baptista.cynikal.net/





-- 
Joe Baptista

www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & 
Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
 Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
    Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084

Personal: http://baptista.cynikal.net/



-- 
Joe Baptista

www.publicroot.org
PublicRoot Consortium
----------------------------------------------------------------
The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative & 
Accountable to the Internet community @large.
----------------------------------------------------------------
 Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
    Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084

Personal: http://baptista.cynikal.net/