ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] This list.....

  • To: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] This list.....
  • From: Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:22:31 -0400

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Debbie Garside
<debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

>  Joe wrote:
>
> "She must be a good negotiator - she has been well rewarded. "
>
> How so?  As far as I know I have not received any rewards, inducements,
> incentives or anything else you would like to accuse me of whilst I was List
> Monitor.  I have not received any rewards either prior to or since - just in
> case you were wondering :-)
>

But you did. After you resigned as list monitor what committee were you
appointed to? You can answer that one for us.


>
> It would seem that people here miss my style of "dictatorship".
>

If you feel thats the case - then run for chair. Any support you think you
have will be tabulated in the votes.

As for the above statement - I hope your not begging me again to be list
monitor. You made a farce of this list - it's rules and processes - and the
agreements we had between us plus chair

A ruling was made that the allegations by an icann staff member (Patrick I
think it was) were vexatious. You overruled our decision and made a farce of
it all. So you have lost my trust.

But you may very well be right. This place may need a dictatorship. Let's
vote.

Speak to your ICANN masters - just follow the leash from collar to hand -
tell them to give us our voting rights and provide the facilities to vote -
and you can offer yourself up as Chair.


I have to say, I don't read this list very often, and I don't miss it
> either.
>

I bet you read it all the time ... late at night ... under the covers ...
while pacing yourself with chatroulette. Just kidding ;)

Seriously Debbie. I think the stunt you pulled as monitor and the small
morsel you got back for it was not worth the effort.

You made it very clear back then your intent was to kill the GA. It didn't
work. But as Chair you may be able to swing it.

kindest regards
joe baptista



>
> Debbie
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Joe Baptista
> *Sent:* 29 April 2010 03:25
> *To:* ken stubbs
> *Cc:* ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [ga] This list.....
>
> Ken. What a pleasure to see you speak up. There must be a fire somewhere.
>
> Your someone who is very close to ICANN. Tell them we need them to provide
> their side of the bargain and give us our right to vote back. You want a
> civil forum - we need an election.
>
> Also I have lost complete faith with ICANN since the Debbie incident. She
> must be a good negotiator - she has been well rewarded. I'm glad in fact
> that is the case because she did a good job of showing everyone on the GA
> what a dictatorship would be like under debbie. Thank God she resigned. Did
> you engineer that bit of nonsense.
>
> Anyway ... send it up the pipe. Time for an election.
>
> regards
> joe baptista
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, ken stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Ken Stubbs wrote:
>>
>> I have been a subscriber to this list for almost 12 years now and have
>> seen
>> the value diminsh significantly because of threads like this one..
>>
>> Its sad to see a forum for discussion, (purportedly ICANN related),
>> degenerate
>> to this level.
>>
>> Hopefully subscribers can still find some value in it, but, I am
>> rapidly losing hope that
>> this goal is attainable..
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/28/2010 2:26 PM, Thomas Baxter wrote:
>>
>> >AHA
>> >- Here you can see more of joes lieing - Joe send an e-mail to this law
>> >>person and TELLS the law person that HE (joe) is thinking that some
>> >laws are
>> >>broke and impys this to the law person.
>> >
>> >>The law person being political, wants to say "YES, HUMMM HUMMM" and not
>> >>contredect some member of the public and then tell joe that if there is
>> >a criminal
>> >>that ok, to call the police.
>> >
>> >>Notice that the law person DID NOT SAY THAT THEY AGREED OR KNOWS ANY
>> >>INDEPENDENCE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS - ONLY THEY LISTEND TO JOES VERSION
>> >>AND RELYED ON THIS ONLY.
>> >
>> >>Do you all see the nature of this scams from Joe - do you see how he
>> >trys to
>> >>lie and fool all persons? He tries to make you think that the person
>> >WAS SAYING
>> >>THAT THERE IS A BROKE LAW AND CRIMINALS AND AGREES WITH JOE - THAT
>> >>IS **********NOT************** AT ALL WHAT THE POLITICIEN SAID -
>> >>READ THIS CAREFULY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> >
>> >>BEWARE.
>> >
>> >
>> >BAX! Names Allentown
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Joe Baptista
>
> www.publicroot.org
> PublicRoot Consortium
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> The future of the Internet is Open, Transparent, Inclusive, Representative
> & Accountable to the Internet community @large.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>  Office: +1 (360) 526-6077 (extension 052)
>     Fax: +1 (509) 479-0084
>
> Personal: http://baptista.cynikal.net/
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>