Re: [ga] European MP says "unbelievable" German high school student getting away with domain scam

[Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John if Matthew really wants to investigate let me provide him with some
references.

All you have to do Matthew is read the investigation conducted by Karl
Peters of the TLDA. The same organization that John is a director of. That
can be found at the URL: http://bit.ly/9gTXgQ as a gzip file. I think it's 9
megs in size.

Of course I don't expect you to read it Matthew and remind John that it may
be inappropriate to appeal to Matthew as judge jury and executioner. I don't
think he has time for that ... but ...

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:47 AM, John Palmer <
jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> In case you aren't aware, let me fill you in. Joe Baptista attempted to
> extort shares
> of stock in a company called UNIDT back in 2005 and when they wouldn't give
> in to
> his extortion attempts, he launched a campaign of slander and lies against
> the operators
> of that company.
>

Not true. I did make clear to all involved I would go public if what was
promised was not delivered. You see Matthew I agreed to support an
organization having a membership in which TLD holders would be the members.
This organization was designated as INAIC.

My investigation showed the organization was designed to only have one
member - Herman Xennt. That is not what was promised - I gave them time to
fix the problem and then I shut down the show when they failed to meet my
demands by going public. I did my duty on behalf of the TLD holders in the
project and demanded they get what was promised - a vote.

And if there is any dispute of these claims I would point you or anyone else
who may be interested to a decision of the Amsterdam court published March
2006 http://bit.ly/au3qfs in which the judge presiding over the matter known
as "Herman Xennt v. Martijn Burger & INAIC" confirms my claims above. The
decision is in dutch.


> The German student is a businessperson who is operating a business
> that is an affiliate of a company (INAIC - www.inaic.com) that is
> associated with UNIDT
> the victim of this extortion attempt. Joe is using this poor student as a
> pawn in his
> insane vendetta against the operators of INAIC, many of which were involved
> in the
> company UNIDT that was a victim of Joe.
>

No - the student in this is completely irrelevant to the issues at hand.
What is relevant is the teenager is selling stolen TLDs and using his school
as a backdrop to convince people the scam is real.

As for the teenager being a business person - I have no idea of that. I
would say that a prudent business person would of done their due diligence
and taken the time to invest INAIC. A prudent business person would quickly
come to the conclusion the INAIC smelled bad and would of stayed away from
it and not gotten implicated in a fraud.

The real issue for me John is that the schools name is being used to
prostitute the Herman Xennt con game. Because people John is absolutely
right in asking the question if the student is in fact misrepresenting the
school and using the schools name inappropriately then why has nothing
happened. Why is the student still using the schools name to market Palmers
& Xennts stolen TLD investory.

The school is obligated to act if not only to protect the public but also
itself from a scandalous association. Thats the issue I'm pursuing here.

As for the student. I no longer know if he's a budding career criminal or a
victim himself of the fraud. In the beginning I gave him the benefit of the
doubt. But when I found out he was caught impersonating a school official in
email to ARIN and his principle tells him to not use the school name - yet
he does - we'll I'm not so sure what to make of him but I don't think at
this stage he is innocent.

<snip> <snip> <psychodrama> <psychobabble> <deleted>


> The "story" that Joe has posted on his website regarding the student at
> Gymnasium Querfurt
> is a fabrication entirely of Joe's making.
>

OK - next question in the John Palmer accountability series. My article on
the school mentions Keith Teare calling you guys at INAIC a scam. Assume I
have supporting documentary proof of this - what do you have to say
concerning his comments?


regards
joe baptista

p.s. <snip> <snip> <psychodrama> <psychobabble> <deleted>