<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] 5. gTLDs to limit/restrict or Laissez faire
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] 5. gTLDs to limit/restrict or Laissez faire
- From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:56:42 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family:
Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color:
#ffffff;color: black;}p{margin:0px}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16825" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Eric and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> You left out one important aspect here. That being "Whom will
have control of what gTLD and/or IP</P>
<P>address space" and what will be the criterion of having that control.
Seems that DOC/NTIA is open</P>
<P>in this regard, but ICANN and a few of it's larger financial contributing
Constituencies have a much</P>
<P>different view. Ergo their "Brand" of social engenerring seeks to
become the gate keepers. This</P>
<P>leaves one to ask oneself is such appropriate and/or
reasonable/rational? I say NO, no few</P>
<P>Special Interest Groups should have this overiding power for many obvious
and a few not</P>
<P>so obvious reasons that have been debated and discussed sense
1999.<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff
2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker
<HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Sep 27, 2009 9:37 AM <BR>To: GA
<GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] 5. gTLDs to limit/restrict or Laissez
faire <BR><BR>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top>
<DIV id=yiv1342976123>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">New gTLD roll outs are
at the core and foundation of the reason for ICANN to even be in
existance. The papers of Postal and the early machinations on this list
1999-2003 had really very little to do with technical process. The task
of the JPA concept is not rooted in some arcane data base at DARPA. The US
departmen tasked with this whole matter is not scientific but COMMERCE. Indeed
it would seem that science based engineers are fairing much better at consensus
and movement toward stability than are the social science based governance
engineers.</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Governance in the area
of addressing seems like a it does not exist. Postel told us; "A name indicates
what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get
there." <SPAN class=yshortcuts id=lw_1254061891_3 style="BACKGROUND: none
transparent scroll repeat 0% 0%; CURSOR: hand; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">Jon
Postel</SPAN><BR></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">The name space is doing
quite well it seems without real interference from any government. What is most
argued over is the COMMERCE of domain name space. </SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">So the debate is not so
much over "can we technically", but how shall we limit? how shall we control
and how shall we charge?</SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial"><STRONG></STRONG></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Laissez Faire is well
described as a failure by Dr. Doom over to Forbes</SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><STRONG><A
href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/18/depression-financial-crisis-capitalism-opinions-columnists_recession_stimulus.html";
target=_blank
rel=nofollow>http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/18/depression-financial-crisis-capitalism-opinions-columnists_recession_stimulus.html</A></STRONG></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial"><STRONG></STRONG></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><STRONG>Bertrand Russel
mused that ""There is much pleasure to be gained by useless
knowledge."</STRONG></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY:
Arial"><STRONG> </DIV></STRONG></SPAN></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<P><BR> </P>
<P>Regards,<BR><BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over
294k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest
freedom" -<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the
performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" -
Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and
the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied
by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll
Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir.
1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated
1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good
standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Phone:
214-244-4827</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|