<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ATTENTION: DRAFT 2 of Criteria for Determining Legitimate Claims to Top Level Domains
- To: Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] ATTENTION: DRAFT 2 of Criteria for Determining Legitimate Claims to Top Level Domains
- From: Chuck Crawford <chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:55:29 -0500
How do I get off this list?
Thomas Baxter wrote:
Oh, and is this non-sense going on still? Is holey joe still preeching
to everyone and chasing herman from holland all over
the universe? I left along time back - sized up the operation and saw
no values.
Looking at the list archives from the members list, confirms that I
was correct, 100 per cent.
You all just might like the torture, because there is no work done
there, and i cant see how it will ever get done at all.
What a study in futilty from the beginning till every one dies. I
cannot see what amusements you all get from it, maybe its
just me.
Thoms
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*To:* public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Cc:* ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Sent:* Monday, June 1, 2009 12:36:22 AM
*Subject:* [ga] ATTENTION: DRAFT 2 of Criteria for Determining
Legitimate Claims to Top Level Domains
We've been working on the rules by which the TLDA Compliance Committee
will determine which version of TLDs will be reccommended by the TLDA.
I've posted Draft #2 on the Members list, but thought I'd post it here
to see if the public has any comments on it.
Please chime in if you have any recommendations or criticisms of this
draft.
John
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.46/2145 - Release Date: 05/31/09 05:53:00
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|