Re: [ga] ATTENTION: DRAFT 2 of Criteria for Determining Legitimate Claims to Top Level Domains
- To: POST-TO GNSO LIST <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] ATTENTION: DRAFT 2 of Criteria for Determining Legitimate Claims to Top Level Domains
- From: Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Oh, and is this non-sense going on still? Is holey joe still preeching to
everyone and chasing herman from holland all over
the universe? I left along time back - sized up the operation and saw no
Looking at the list archives from the members list, confirms that I was
correct, 100 per cent.
You all just might like the torture, because there is no work done there, and i
cant see how it will ever get done at all.
What a study in futilty from the beginning till every one dies. I cannot see
what amusements you all get from it, maybe its
From: John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2009 12:36:22 AM
Subject: [ga] ATTENTION: DRAFT 2 of Criteria for Determining Legitimate Claims
to Top Level Domains
We've been working on the rules by which the TLDA Compliance Committee will
determine which version of TLDs will be reccommended by the TLDA.
I've posted Draft #2 on the Members list, but thought I'd post it here to see
if the public has any comments on it.
Please chime in if you have any recommendations or criticisms of this draft.