<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] ICANN staff researching my political stance on Obama? hahaha
- To: "George Kirikos" <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] ICANN staff researching my political stance on Obama? hahaha
- From: "Karl E. Peters" <tlda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:47:44 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Verdana; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div> </div>
<div> My hearty congratulations to you on reaching such
a position of respect!!! (Maybe not honor, but certainly respect!) No one would
have to do any research to know where I stand on Obama! Even if he does prove
he is constitutionally allowed to take office, something he insists in not
necessary, I have a hard time respecting someone with such low regard for the
constitution of the country he proposes to lead, often remarking that he feels
it is more like guidelines and not really law. </div>
<div> Anyone at ICANN wanting to know more, just let me
know!!! I could go on for a while! In exchange, I would like to know why they
care... They have no personal (legal) benefit from digging for and knowing
anyone's stand on political officials. Are they under contract to research for
someone else? THAT would be interesting!</div>
<div>-Karl E. Peters</div>
<div> </div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px;
BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px solid; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: verdana" webmail="1">
<div >-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: [ga] ICANN staff
researching my political stance on Obama?<BR>hahaha<BR>From: George Kirikos
<gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Fri, January 09, 2009 5:15 pm<BR>To:
ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR><BR><BR>Hi folks,<BR><BR>I found this amusing log entry on
my webserver logs:<BR><BR>192.0.39.151 - - [09/Jan/2009:15:37:51 -0500] "GET /
HTTP/1.1" 200 6654<BR>"<a
href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=george+kirikos+obama&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=";
target=_blank
mce_href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=george+kirikos+obama&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=";>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=george+kirikos+obama&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=</a>"<BR>"Mozilla/5.0
(Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5)<BR>Gecko/2008120122
Firefox/3.0.5"<BR><BR>I guess the ICANN staffer at 192.0.39.151:<BR><BR><a
href="http://whois.domaintools.com/192.0.39.151"; target=_blank
mce_href="http://whois.domaintools.com/192.0.39.151";>http://whois.domaintools.com/192.0.39.151</a><BR><BR>wlan39-151.mdr.icann.org<BR><BR>wonders
how I feel about Obama? There weren't any real matches (just<BR>pages that had
headings for other articles, or quotes of my articles,<BR>with stuff like Jeff
Williams and a signature about Obama from him, not<BR>me). But if you really
want to know, you just had to ask! He seems like<BR>a nice guy, and hopefully
will turnaround the US economy, although<BR>raising taxes might not be the best
approach. He's got a lot of smart<BR>people around him, like Warren Buffett, so
hopefully they'll steer him<BR>in the right direction. Is this the "dirt" you
were looking for? Next<BR>time use an anonymous proxy, moron.<BR><BR>It's a
sign of bloated staff at ICANN, when they have such free time to<BR>try to
research the political beliefs of people who are genuinely<BR>trying to improve
policies (people who are not even from the USA! next<BR>thing you'll know,
they'll be analyzing my views on Prime Minister<BR>Harper!), instead of
spending their time improving their work.<BR><BR>How many others who posted
negatively about new gTLDs are being<BR>researched by ICANN staff? Are they
researching DOC, NTIA and DOJ<BR>staffers, to attempt to undermine their
comments in Washington, D.C.?<BR>ICANN does pay for lobbying in Washington, if
you read their Form 990.<BR>$240,000 in 2006-2007, according to page 16 of the
PDF at:<BR><BR><a
href="http://www.icann.org/en/financials/tax/us/fy-2007-form-990.pdf";
target=_blank
mce_href="http://www.icann.org/en/financials/tax/us/fy-2007-form-990.pdf";>http://www.icann.org/en/financials/tax/us/fy-2007-form-990.pdf</a><BR><BR>Are
they researching employees of Microsoft who were against new gTLDs<BR>to know
how they feel about Obama? And staff at other large companies?<BR><BR>I'm
honoured to be considered such a "threat" to ICANN, that they care<BR>so much
to attempt to analyze my thoughts on Obama. Kieren would have<BR>you believe my
opinion doesn't count for anything, but it sure does<BR>seem to matter to
someone at ICANN....<BR><BR>Sincerely,<BR><BR>George Kirikos<BR><a
href="http://www.leap.com/"; target=_blank
mce_href="http://www.leap.com/";>http://www.leap.com/</a><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|