Re: [ga] DN TLD Allocation Implementation Processes

["Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Glen and all,

  Again, thank you for sending this update.  Based on what
our members have thus far reviewed and sent in comments
in on there are a few substative concerning areas in the IDN
gTLD proposal, and the new gTLD selection process that
our members have that need addressing and have been
articulated before that still don't seem to be addressed
in ICANN's process documents you provided links to
below.

  The remainder on specific comments are below, interspersed
as is appropriate...

Glen de Saint Géry wrote:

> [To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
> [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
> [To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-20aug08-en.htm
> IDN TLD Allocation Implementation Processes
>
> 20 August 2008
>
> Following the progress on the IDN TLD allocation processes during the ICANN 
> meeting in Paris a new area has been made available to describe IDN policy 
> development and IDN ccTLD allocation developments under ICANN's IDN Area: 
> http://icann.org/en/topics/idn.
>
> At the Paris meeting, the Board approved both of the processes described 
> below for implementation.
>
> In relation to the IDN ccTLD "fast track" process it was resolved that the 
> Board directs staff to: "(1) post the IDNC WG final report for public 
> comments; (2) commence work on implementation issues in consultation with 
> relevant stakeholders; and (3) submit a detailed implementation report 
> including a list of any outstanding issues to the Board in advance of the 
> ICANN Cairo meeting in November 2008."

  Concerns here are much along the lines that Karl outlined in his
original comments and concerns
in this part of the process being considered.  Such being that ICANN is
hardly in a good business
possition to be making business decisions as to which, what, and how new
IDN gTLD's should be,
or must be introduced and would in accordance with US law a predisposed
and determined with
stated intent to restrain trade and subject to such a legal challange
accordingly.

>
> Fast-track IDN ccTLD Activities
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast-track/
>
> On a related note, the ICANN Board also adopted "the GNSO policy 
> recommendations for the introduction of new gTLDs.
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-15jul08-en.htm
>  And further that the Board directs staff to continue to further develop and 
> complete its detailed implementation plan, continue communication with the 
> community on such work, and provide the Board with a final version of the 
> implementation proposals for the board and community to approve before the 
> new gTLD introduction process is launched."

  Two main problems here, one is that there is no outlined or specified
cost determined, second and more
importantly is that yet again predetermining with willfull and stated
intent to dictate any implimentation
method would almost certainly be a restraint of trade, and as such be
inconsistant with the "Do no harm"
doctrine of DOC/NTIA as well as face likely legal challange.

  Additional problems with the GNSO recomendations is that they do not
take into account for
already existing gTLD's in other root structures currently in use in
commerce setting up
a very possible gTLD collision senerio far worse than .BIZ was and to a
degree, remains.
>
> New gTLD Program
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtld-program.htm
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://gnso.icann.org

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Phone: 214-244-4827